It would be difficult to determine the least dystopian government system because it is subjective and depends on individual perspectives and values. So according to my perspective democratic forms of government such as the liberal democracy or social democracy would be the less subjected to dystopian characteristics. This is due to the fact that they often possess higher levels of individual freedoms, civil liberties, and political participation, making them less likely to be considered dystopian compared to authoritarian or totalitarian regimes. While there is a chance that a dictatorship or another type of authoritarian government could be utopian it is highly unlikely. This is due to the fact that when humans possess a large amount of power and influence it is hard for them to retain their humanity and do what is best for their people instead of themselves.
In democracies, citizens have the right to vote, express their opinions, and hold their government accountable through free and fair elections. Additionally, democratic systems often have checks and balances to prevent the concentration of power in any one individual or group, reducing the likelihood of authoritarianism and abuse of power. Overall, democracies aim to represent the wants and needs of its citizens and uphold principles of equality, justice, and human rights, making them less likely to be associated with oppressive or dystopian conditions compared to autocratic or totalitarian regimes.
But within a democratic government there are different types, the social and liberal democracy. They are both forms of representative government, but they differ in their emphasis on economic and social policies. Social democracy prioritizes social justice, equality, and welfare programs, advocating for a strong social safety net, progressive taxation, and government intervention to address socioeconomic inequalities. In contrast, liberal democracy emphasizes individual freedoms, civil liberties, and limited government intervention in the economy. It focuses on protecting individual rights, free markets, and the rule of law. While both systems aim to balance individual rights with collective welfare, they diverge in their approaches to economic policy and the role of government in society. Ultimately the least dystopian form of government would be the social democracy because it puts its citizens first and is the most humanitarian based form of government.